Home > Evidence & resources >Try it on Monday: Practical solutions – and opportunities – to strengthen teacher professional development at scale

Synthesis paper

17 March 2026

Try it on Monday: Practical solutions – and opportunities – to strengthen teacher professional development at scale

Authors:

Jessica Mejía

Suggested bibliographic citation: Mejía, J. 2025. Try it on Monday: Practical solutions – and opportunities – to strengthen teacher professional development at scale. What Works Hub for Global Education. Synthesis paper. 2026/001. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-WhatWorksHubforGlobalEducation-RP_2026/001

Abstract

This guidance note provides practical recommendations for designing effective, scalable, and sustainable teacher professional development (TPD) programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It draws on structured pedagogy research, large-scale implementation experiences (including Kenya’s Tusome and Uganda’s LARA programmes), and the author’s direct experience implementing TPD programmes across multiple countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and Asia. The central premise is that teacher professional development must be understood as a continuous cycle of learning, practice, reflection and support, not as a one-off training event.

References

Beggs, C., & Bell, S. (2024). The middle tier and improving foundational literacy outcomes: New evidence from best-practice districts in Rwanda. RTI International.

CAST. (2018). CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Kotzé, J., Mohohlwane, N., Taylor, S., & Thulare, T. (2022). Can virtual replace in-person coaching? Experimental evidence on teacher professional development and student learning. Journal of Development Economics, 155, 102815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102815

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Pfeiffer.

Craig, H., Kraft, R., & du Plessis, J. (1998). Teacher development: Making an impact. USAID & The World Bank.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Dirkx, J. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. 89), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.9

Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel. (2023). Cost-effective approaches to improve global learning (Smart Buys). World Bank & FCDO. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/231d98251cf326922518be0cbe306fdc-0200022023/related/GEEAP-Report-Smart-Buys-2023-final.pdf

Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005

Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080

Jita, L. C., & Mokhele, M. L. (2014). When teacher clusters work: Selected experiences of South African teachers with the cluster approach to professional development. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412071132

Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. 2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kotzé, J., Fleisch, B., & Taylor, S. (2019). Alternative forms of early grade instructional coaching: Emerging evidence from field experiments in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.09.004

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. *American Psychologist, 59*(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Mejía, J. (2020). Structured pedagogy guide 5: Teacher professional development: Teacher training. Science of Teaching. https://scienceofteaching.site/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SP_5_TeacherProfessional-Dev.-Teacher-Training-1_ed-1.pdf

Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-14.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4754.

NORC at the University of Chicago. (2020). Tusome External Evaluation: Endline Report. USAID/Kenya and East Africa. https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdfs/PA00XVBP.pdf

NORC at the University of Chicago. (2020). Uganda performance and impact evaluation for Literacy Achievement and Retention Activity (LARA). https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdfs/LARA%20P%20and%20IE_Midterm%20IE%20and%20Final%20PE%20Report.pdf

Piper, B., Destefano, J., Kinyanjui, E. M., & Ong’ele, S. (2018). Scaling up successfully: Lessons from Kenya’s Tusome national literacy program. Journal of Educational Change, 19(3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9325-4

Piper, B. L., Mejía, J. M., Spratt, J. E., Betts, K. L., Sitabkhan, Y. A., Sowa, P. A., &; Ralaingita, W. D. (2019, April). Training teachers or robots? Unexpected findings of a 7-country teacher professional development study. Comparative and International Education Society conference, San Francisco, CA.

Piper, B., Mejía, J., & Betts, K. (2020). Do’s and don’ts of improving teaching through instructional support: Findings from a multi-country study of coaching and communities of practice. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society.

Piper, Benjamin & Zuilkowski, Stephanie & Kwayumba, Dunston & Strigel, Carmen. (2016). Does technology improve reading outcomes? Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICT interventions for early grade reading in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development. 49. 204-214. https://doi.org10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.03.006

Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006

Pouezevara, S. (Ed.) (2018). Cultivating dynamic educators: Case studies in teacher behavior change in Africa and Asia. RTI Press.  RTI Press Book No. BK-0022-1809 https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.bk.0022.1809

Ralaingita, W. (2020). Structured pedagogy guide 6: Teacher professional development: Ongoing teacher support. Science of Teaching, https://scienceofteaching.site/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SP_6_Teacher-Professional-Dev-Ongoing-Teacher-Support.pdf

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. *Cognitive Science, 12*(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998 Cambridge University Press.

Westbrook, J., Durrani, N., Brown, R., Orr, D., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., & Salvi, F. (2013). Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries: A rigorous literature review. Department for International Development.

Discover more

Young female student with notebook. Photo by Apex 360, Unsplash.

What we do

Our work will directly affect up to 3 million children, and reach up to 17 million more through its influence.

Teacher sits on the floor with group of students. Photo by Husniati Salma, Unsplash.

Who we are

A group of strategic partners, consortium partners, researchers, policymakers, practitioners and professionals working together.

Children reading. Photo by Andrwe Ebrahim, Unsplash.

Get involved

Share our goal of literacy, numeracy and other key skills for all children? Follow us, work with us or join us at an event.

Loading...
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.